Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Nicolas Sebrecht a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 01:49:02PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009, Sam Hocevar wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009, Christian Couder wrote: > > > > > > #: git-gui.sh:2484 lib/index.tcl:410 > > > > > > msgid "Revert Changes" > > > > > > -msgstr "Annuler les modifications (revert)" > > > > > > +msgstr "Révoquer les modifications" > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that "Révoquer" is better than "Annuler". > > > > > > > > Perhaps "Inverser"? > > [...] > > > Sorry, I misread the Wikipedia interface because I wasn't logged in > > and only admins can truly revert edits. > > I don't think that we have to conform to Wikipédia. > > > So it does have "revert" (to > > cancel an edit) and "undo" (to perform the opposite edit of a given > > edit), which get translated to "révoquer" and "défaire". I therefore > > think "révoquer" is just as good as the others. > > I disagree here. > > "Annuler", "Révoquer", "Inverser" or "Défaire" usualy stands for the > same thing but : > - thoses words doesn't have stricly the same meanings ; > - we are in a special case here because of the underlying technical > result. > > We should care that the revert operation does *not* remove a commit but > add a new one (this makes sense to Git). As a consequence, we should > avoid "Annuler", "Révoquer" and "Défaire". > > "Inverser" looks like the best translation. Yeah, I agree with that reasoning. Regards, Christian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
