Deskin Miller <deskinm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I did 'git branch -M @{-1}' yesterday and ended up renaming my branch > to refs/heads/@{-1}. Personally my usage felt like it should work > (but of course I think that); curious to know what others think, if > this is a bug. The @{-n} notation is supposed to be usable anywhere you would write a branch name and should behave as if you wrote the name itself. And 'git branch -M <name> [<name>]' does expect a branch name, not a random extended SHA-1 expression. I'd say it is a bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html