Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Teach @{-1} to git merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

>  * I know "show-branch @{-1} HEAD" does not dereference @{-1}, but I
>    suspect there may be many others.

I scanned command-list.txt briefly, and could verify (by testing rather 
than code inspection) that

- bundle works as expected (thanks to dwim_ref()),

- fast-export (like bundle, dwim_ref() makes it work),

- so does filter-branch, thanks to rev-parse --symbolic-full-name 
  resolving @{-<n>} correctly,

- log and reflog also substitute @{-<n>} by the branch name,

- update-ref does _not_ interpret @{-<n>} as the branch name (which I 
  find okay, as update-ref is plumbing), but instead creates the file 
  '.git/@{-<n>}' (which I think is a bug).

Now, show-branch indeed does not substitute the branch _name_, but 
otherwise it works correctly, no?  And given the fact that show-branch 
does not substitute "HEAD" with the current branch name, either, I wonder 
if show-branch needs fixing at all.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux