Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Teach @{-1} to git merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 17:52, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I scanned command-list.txt briefly, and could verify (by testing rather
> than code inspection) that
>
> - bundle works as expected (thanks to dwim_ref()),
>
> - fast-export (like bundle, dwim_ref() makes it work),
>
> - so does filter-branch, thanks to rev-parse --symbolic-full-name
>  resolving @{-<n>} correctly,
>
> - log and reflog also substitute @{-<n>} by the branch name,
>
> - update-ref does _not_ interpret @{-<n>} as the branch name (which I
>  find okay, as update-ref is plumbing), but instead creates the file
>  '.git/@{-<n>}' (which I think is a bug).
>

I did 'git branch -M @{-1}' yesterday and ended up renaming my branch
to refs/heads/@{-1}.  Personally my usage felt like it should work
(but of course I think that); curious to know what others think, if
this is a bug.

Deskin Miller
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux