Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] t3301: use test_must_fail instead of !

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:46:28AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Even if they were in POSIX, I'd suggest not to change the constructs.  
> rebase is _bound_ to be built in.
> 
> Even if Stephan is not a fan of my recent changes to rebase -i -p (which I 
> will present on this list once they all work as I want them to), I think I 
> can talk him into continuing the sequencer effort: he was not discussing 
> the design in the open, so he should have expected the process to be 
> dragged out.

Having a sequencer in C would make me even happier. ;)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux