Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] t3301: use test_must_fail instead of !

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/2/17 Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:29:57AM +0000, Mike Ralphson wrote:
>> posh? http://packages.debian.org/lenny/posh
>
> Hmm. I tried "make SHELL_PATH=/bin/posh test", and posh segfaulted during
> t0005. So I don't think it's quite ready for mainstream use. ;)

Works ok for me as far as t3404-rebase-interactive on next, though
what I actually grabbed in the end was 0.6.16[1], which claims to fix
a segfault bug[2], but then it also claims to be 0.6.12 as well, so
who knows? 8-)

Maybe a Debian user would like to report a repeat of [3]?

Mike

[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/posh
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515278
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397596
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux