On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:00:17PM +0000, Mike Ralphson wrote: > > Hmm. I tried "make SHELL_PATH=/bin/posh test", and posh segfaulted during > > t0005. So I don't think it's quite ready for mainstream use. ;) > > Works ok for me as far as t3404-rebase-interactive on next, though > what I actually grabbed in the end was 0.6.16[1], which claims to fix > a segfault bug[2], but then it also claims to be 0.6.12 as well, so > who knows? 8-) > > Maybe a Debian user would like to report a repeat of [3]? Hmm. It sort of fixes the segfault bug. With posh 0.6.16, I can do: $ posh -x $ ls + ls ... but: $ posh -x t0005-signals.sh Segmentation fault OK, maybe it doesn't like non-interactive shells. Let's try sourcing the script: $ posh -x $ . t0005-signals.sh + . t0005-signals.sh posh: .: t0005-signals.sh: not found OK, maybe it is looking in the PATH? $ PATH=$PATH:. Segmentation fault Oops. How about a new shell with a more exact path? $ posh -x $ . ./t0005-signals.sh Segmentation fault Oops. So I think there are some serious problems (at least with -x). Of course it's hard to diagnose the non "-x" segfault in t0005 without "-x". ;) But this is just unproductive complaining to do it on the git list (I'm just amazed at how frequently it is segfaulting). I'll go file some Debian bug reports. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
