onsdag 18 februari 2009 22:48:59 skrev "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Shawn wrote:
> > > > + os.writeUTF(KEY_FETCH);
> > > > + os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + for (RefSpec refspec : push) {
> > > > + os.writeUTF(KEY_PUSH);
> > > > + os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Should we maybe allow RefSpec to serialize itself with
> > > os.writeObject() rather than using writeUTF() directly?
> >
> > Doesn't the style above make it easy to define and document
> > a format that is easy for non-java programs to write and read,
> > while writeObject introduces java-centric stuff (depending on
> > the full class name etc).
>
> Non-Java reading a Java serialization stream? Seriously?
No, that was my objection to using writeObject, as that make
it a Java-only stream, but then it might not be worth doing
it via the serialization mechanism.
-- robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
