Re: [JGIT PATCH] 1/2 : (reworked) Externalizable/Serializable Items

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shawn wrote:
> > > +            os.writeUTF(KEY_FETCH);
> > > +            os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > > +        }
> > > +
> > > +        for (RefSpec refspec : push) {
> > > +        	os.writeUTF(KEY_PUSH);
> > > +            os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > > +        }
> > 
> > Should we maybe allow RefSpec to serialize itself with
> > os.writeObject() rather than using writeUTF() directly?
> 
> Doesn't the style above make it easy to define and document
> a format that is easy for non-java programs to write and read,
> while writeObject introduces java-centric stuff (depending on
> the full class name etc).

Non-Java reading a Java serialization stream?  Seriously?

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux