Shawn wrote:
> > + os.writeUTF(KEY_FETCH);
> > + os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (RefSpec refspec : push) {
> > + os.writeUTF(KEY_PUSH);
> > + os.writeUTF(refspec.toString());
> > + }
>
> Should we maybe allow RefSpec to serialize itself with
> os.writeObject() rather than using writeUTF() directly?
Doesn't the style above make it easy to define and document
a format that is easy for non-java programs to write and read,
while writeObject introduces java-centric stuff (depending on
the full class name etc).
-- robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
