Hi, On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 15.01.2009 17:04: > ... > >>> The more I think about it, I think it's possible I broke it with the > >>> introduction of the "noop". > >> It certainly worked after the noop introduction before the r-i-p series, > >> but not any more after. > > > > Umm... which rebase -i -p series do you mean? "noop" was introduced > > pretty recently if my Alzheimered brain does not fool me. > > This one introduced noop: > > commit ff74126c03a8dfd04e7533573a5c420f2a7112ac > Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> > Date: Fri Oct 10 13:42:12 2008 +0200 > > rebase -i: do not fail when there is no commit to cherry-pick > > This is the bad one from bisect: > > commit d80d6bc146232d81f1bb4bc58e5d89263fd228d4 > Author: Stephen Haberman <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Oct 15 02:44:39 2008 -0500 > > rebase-i-p: do not include non-first-parent commits touching UPSTREAM > > It's the last one in a longer series. And that series is after the noop > introduction. Ohhh.... Thanks, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
