Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 15.01.2009 17:04:
...
>>> The more I think about it, I think it's possible I broke it with the
>>> introduction of the "noop".
>> It certainly worked after the noop introduction before the r-i-p series,
>> but not any more after.
>
> Umm... which rebase -i -p series do you mean? "noop" was introduced
> pretty recently if my Alzheimered brain does not fool me.
This one introduced noop:
commit ff74126c03a8dfd04e7533573a5c420f2a7112ac
Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri Oct 10 13:42:12 2008 +0200
rebase -i: do not fail when there is no commit to cherry-pick
This is the bad one from bisect:
commit d80d6bc146232d81f1bb4bc58e5d89263fd228d4
Author: Stephen Haberman <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Oct 15 02:44:39 2008 -0500
rebase-i-p: do not include non-first-parent commits touching UPSTREAM
It's the last one in a longer series. And that series is after the noop
introduction.
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
