Stephan Beyer venit, vidit, dixit 15.01.2009 14:55: > Hi, > >> First of all: git 1.6.0.6 gives you the unchanged graph after using >> rebase -i -p. > > This is true and it is a far better behavior than now, but I think it's > not the expected behavior. (I have written about the behavior I'd expect > in another reply to the original mail.) Yep, I think -p should preserve only merges in side branches (and therefore produce what you suggest, and what you get without -p). If it preserves all merges then there is nothing to rewrite here. BTW: How does the sequencer based rebase do in this case, and what's the general status? If it's about to be integrated we can do without the present script... Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
