[PATCH v2] git-web--browse: don't add start as candidate on Ubuntu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

  Junio C Hamano wrote:
  > Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
  >> Le jeudi 1 janvier 2009, Ramsay Jones a écrit :
  >> ...
  >>> Does anybody else see this issue and can someone test the patch?
  >> Petr, as you added support for using /bin/start on MinGW, could you test?
  >>
  >> diff --git a/git-web--browse.sh b/git-web--browse.sh
  >> index 78d236b..7ed0fad 100755
  >> --- a/git-web--browse.sh
  >> +++ b/git-web--browse.sh
  >> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ if test -z "$browser" ; then
  >>  	browser_candidates="open $browser_candidates"
  >>      fi
  >>      # /bin/start indicates MinGW
  >> -    if test -n /bin/start; then
  >> +    if test -x /bin/start; then
  >>  	browser_candidates="start $browser_candidates"
  >>      fi
  > 
  > In any case, the original test is simply bogus.  'test -n "$foo"' is to
  > see if $foo is an empty string, and giving a constant /bin/start always
  > yields true.
  > 
  > As an old timer, I tend to prefer "test -f" in this context, as anybody
  > sane can expect that the directory /bin will contain executables and
  > nothing else.  Another reason is purely stylistic.  Historically "-f" has
  > been much more portable than "-x" (which came from SVID), even though it
  > wouldn't make much difference in practice in the real world these days.

Sorry for the late reply; if this has already been resolved, then sorry for
the noise.

I was expecting to be castigated for having /sbin in my $PATH. Indeed, I was
a bit surprised... So, I checked my initialization files and then the system
initialization files and could not find where it was being set...

    $ strings /bin/bash | grep sbin
    /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
    $ strings /bin/sh | grep sbin
    PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

So I don't think it's anything I'm doing...

Anyway, I've changed the patch as you suggested. It would still be good
if someone on MinGW could test it.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

 git-web--browse.sh |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/git-web--browse.sh b/git-web--browse.sh
index 78d236b..c5e62a6 100755
--- a/git-web--browse.sh
+++ b/git-web--browse.sh
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ if test -z "$browser" ; then
 	browser_candidates="open $browser_candidates"
     fi
     # /bin/start indicates MinGW
-    if test -n /bin/start; then
+    if test -f /bin/start; then
 	browser_candidates="start $browser_candidates"
     fi
 
-- 
1.6.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux