Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> writes: >> Hmm, I actually was thinking about applying that (and that one only) >> early >> to my tree, to make sure it is regression-free. > > Does "early" mean that you want to wait and see how the discussion > about the other patches evolves before you consider applying them, > or does "and that one only" mean that you tend to not apply the > other patches at all? My initial impression after reading 1/6 was that no matter how the actual runtime prefix detection logic that is implemented in the later parts of the series for particular platform will turn out to be, the update to the Makefile that is done by 1/6 won't have to change. If I apply 1/6 first without applying anything else, we can make sure that it would not regress for Unix people (and catch regressions early if any), while Windows people polish the platform specific parts of the implementation in the later parts of the series that can be replaced. Because changes to Makefile variables tend to have unexpected side effects (people have their own definition to override them in their build procedures and you can easily break them unless you are careful), I wanted to make sure the common part is solid before waiting for the other part. But if you think it is better not to apply any one, until other parts mature, it is Ok by me, too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
