On Jan 10, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> writes:
On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Logically, and to avoid committing a broken revision, 1/6 should
come
last, methinks.
RUNTIME_PREFIX is not defined before 6/6. But I agree,
1/6 should probably be moved after 5/6.
Hmm, I actually was thinking about applying that (and that one only)
early
to my tree, to make sure it is regression-free.
Does "early" mean that you want to wait and see how the discussion
about the other patches evolves before you consider applying them,
or does "and that one only" mean that you tend to not apply the
other patches at all?
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
