Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add -n/--no-prompt option to mergetool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:32:17PM +0100, William Pursell wrote:
>
> If the short option is dropped, the config option should
> probably associated with mergetool.<tool>.interactive rather
> than mergetool.interactive.  (s/interactive/whatever)

I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. The no-prompt/interactive
option affects the behaviour of the mergetool script independent of
which particular merge tool is being used. Why should the presence or
absence of a short option affect whether the config option is global
or per tool?

-- 
Charles Bailey
http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux