On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>
> There is discussion already about "-n should be for dry-run!" and git's
> inconsistencies in such matters. Wouldn't -y ("assume yes on prompt")
> be better?
>
I must have missed this discussion. I've just had a very quick look at
a handful of basic modifying git commands (merge, pull, commit,
checkout, reset, revert) and only found 'add' that used -n as
--dry-run.
That said, I've no real objections to -y if that makes for a better
consensus.
--
Charles Bailey
http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
