Re: interactive rebase not rebasing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I've attempted to do that. Now that I sent in the patch, if you could
> > review it, I would appreciate your feedback.
> 
> I'm heading home from work now. I'll look it over tonight or tomorrow
> morning.

Cool, thanks.

Question: how taboo is it to just add another test file?

I'm attempting to integrate my test into t3404, which is the existing
interactive rebase test. The two test_expect_success's I added worked
when I ran them at the start of the test and then reset --hard the
branches back for the other tests, but if I paste my tests where they
should probably be, in the middle after the other -p tests, they break
because the 10 or tests before this have screwed with the DAG already.

I can suffer through getting it to work, but a t3409 would be much
easier, and probably easier to read as well as a I could setup my own
DAG instead of hacking onto 3404s.

> Thanks for the confidence :-)

No problem. :-)

- Stephen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux