Re: [PATCH, resent] fix openssl headers conflicting with custom SHA1 implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:54:58AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I think its easy enough to just rename our SHA_CTX and SHA_*
> > > > functions to something more git specific.  Since its mostly a global
> > > 
> > > I think that is the cleanest and simplest solution. As for merging pain,
> > > I think Junio would generally do a mechanical change like this as the
> > > first thing after a release. However, in this case, I think we might
> > > want it sooner if the conflict is causing breakage.
> > 
> > Oh, yea, that's probably true.  But with ARM broken according to
> > Nico I'd almost just want this fixed in the upcoming 1.6.1 release.
> 
> > Its simple enough to do.  We can even do something like this during
> > the transition period until right before the 1.6.1 final:
> 
> Because it's easy to do then I'd do it sooner than later.

Nico, are you going to write a patch for this?  If not I'll do it
myself later today or tomorrow morning.  I don't mind doing it,
I just don't want to duplicate work with you.  I've got too much
else going on to waste my time that way.

Of course I'm wasting time on this email... ;-)

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux