Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Perry Wagle <wagle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [080801 00:00]:
>> Jeff King has convinced me that it's perfectly legitimate to introduce
>> non-upward compatibilities in minor version releases of "young"
>> software.
>
> This is the gist of the problem.  You keep hammering about a
> "non-upwards compatibilities in minor version releases", yet you have
> *not* pointed out one such in-compatibility in a minor version release..
>
> Remember, in git, 1.6 is a "major version" release, with release notes, etc.
> 1.5.X is a "minor version" release.
> 1.5.X.Y is a "patch" release.

What is X (2.0)?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux