On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:23:50PM -0700, Perry Wagle wrote:
> But, my problem is not git<DASH> vs git<SPACE>, but the slap-dash way
> upward compatibility was broken and the "water over the dam" slippery
> slope rationalizations that refuse to consider reverting. "You" will do
> it again in the future since you are declaring success here. And "you"
> have likely done it in the past 6 months.
I don't think Junio is declaring success. In fact, I think he has sent
several messages saying (paraphrasing of course):
- this was obviously not done in the best manner possible, because of
the number of people complaining
- we will try to do better about notification next time such a change
is made. Please make suggestions about how to do so.
- since we have already released and already broken everybody, and
these people are now complaining on the list, there is not much
point in trying to notify people of _this_ change now
Junio (and others) have tried to be very careful about breaking
backwards compatibility, especially for scripting interfaces. We thought
sufficient steps were taken this time, but clearly some disagree.
So please stop making specious claims that there are crazy
backwards-incompatibility bugs lurking throughout new versions of git.
If there are, then please find and name them. If not, then I think the
git community would welcome suggestions about how better to notify users
about the rare changes like this one.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
