Re: [PATCH 1/6] revisions: refactor init_revisions and setup_revisions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On mar, jui 08, 2008 at 11:43:15 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:59:43AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > 
> > > > setup_revisions has been split in two: parse_revisions that does 
> > > > (almost) only argument parsing, to be more like what parse-options 
> > > > can do, and setup_revisions that does the rest.
> > > 
> > > I do not see the sense of this change, except
> > 
> > Well, it's required to remove "parse_revisions" at once if we one day 
> > reach the goal of having only parse-opt based parsers.
> 
> We can do that, then.
> 
> We do not need to do that, now.

  hmmm right, I may be able to cook a simpler series without that
indeed. Ill repost a new one with this idea.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpHyJ8Ab03ly.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux