Re: RFC: grafts generalised

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Dmitry Potapov" <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, I will stick to extending git fsck to check grafts more
>> rigorously and fix git clone to *refrain* from looking at grafts.
>
> Linus suggested that "git-fsck and repacking should just consider
> it[grafts] to be an  _additional_ source of parenthood rather than
> a _replacement_ source."
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84686

Yeah, thanks for a reminder.

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/37744/focus=37866

is still on my "things to look at" list.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux