Dmitry Potapov wrote: >On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> In that case, I will stick to extending git fsck to check grafts more >> rigorously and fix git clone to *refrain* from looking at grafts. >Linus suggested that "git-fsck and repacking should just consider >it[grafts] to be an _additional_ source of parenthood rather than >a _replacement_ source." >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84686 Yes, I know that's what he suggested, the way it should be implemented IMO though is by checking once without and once with regard to grafts. And still it should be such that git clone disregards grafts completely. I'll fix both, eventually, since I need this functionality to verify correctness for the projects I'm working on at the moment. As for repack, it should probably ignore grafts, except for reference. I.e. repack/gc should consider all mentioned SHA1s in the grafts file to be referenced and undeletable. -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. You are confused; but this is your normal state. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
