Re: RFC: grafts generalised

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Potapov wrote:
>On second thought, it may be not necessary. You can extract an old commit
>object, edit it, put it into Git with a new SHA1, and then use the graft file to
>replace all references from an old to a new one. And you will be able to see
>changes immediately in gitk.

Hmmmm, interesting thought.  That just might solve my problem.
In that case, I will stick to extending git fsck to check grafts more
rigorously and fix git clone to *refrain* from looking at grafts.
If anyone still wants the extended format, I'd be willing to implement
it, but my immediate itch for it is gone.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

You are confused; but this is your normal state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux