Re: [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> 
> But did you not now make it harder to fix "that"?  By relying on the die() 
> behaviour in your regression fix?

If I change return path for some functions, I will have to check all the
callers anyway. So, no I don't think it make things harder to fix. Also
I don't like to add dead code.

Please, let me do this fix so that I can post my next patches. After that
I will be happy to work on what you asked.

Olivier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux