Hi, On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Olivier Marin wrote: > Johannes Schindelin a écrit : > > > > And I do not like this change either. It proliferates the "we just > > die() and do not care about reusing the code where die()ing is not > > desired" paradigm. > > I agree and I'm OK to try to do something about that. But not in that patch. > > This patch is just to fix a regression. But did you not now make it harder to fix "that"? By relying on the die() behaviour in your regression fix? Whatever, Dscho
