Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:46:59PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Hommey wrote: >> >>> While working on the http code refactoring, I got to wonder if the >>> walker.c "wrapper", that is only used for the http transport, is still >>> worth keeping. If there are plans for others transport to use this code, >>> obviously, it would be worth keeping, but on the contrary, I think it >>> would simplify the http transport code even more. What do you think ? >> >> Really, I was waiting for somebody needing ftp and/or sftp support badly >> enough, so let's keep it. >> >> I mean, one of those guys asking for ftp push support _got_ to just start >> scratching that itch, right? > > Though, technically, ftp push could work with the curl code. IIRC git fetch works with FTP transport. Somebody would have to write replacement for WebDAV authentication for ftp / sftp / ftps to have proper ftp push support. There were request, but AFAIR no code. Are you thinking about POP / IMAP transport, or XMPP one ;-PPP ? -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
