Re: Is there a reason to keep walker.c ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:

> While working on the http code refactoring, I got to wonder if the 
> walker.c "wrapper", that is only used for the http transport, is still 
> worth keeping. If there are plans for others transport to use this code, 
> obviously, it would be worth keeping, but on the contrary, I think it 
> would simplify the http transport code even more. What do you think ?

Really, I was waiting for somebody needing ftp and/or sftp support badly 
enough, so let's keep it.

I mean, one of those guys asking for ftp push support _got_ to just start 
scratching that itch, right?

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux