Re: Is there a reason to keep walker.c ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:46:59PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > While working on the http code refactoring, I got to wonder if the 
> > walker.c "wrapper", that is only used for the http transport, is still 
> > worth keeping. If there are plans for others transport to use this code, 
> > obviously, it would be worth keeping, but on the contrary, I think it 
> > would simplify the http transport code even more. What do you think ?
> 
> Really, I was waiting for somebody needing ftp and/or sftp support badly 
> enough, so let's keep it.
> 
> I mean, one of those guys asking for ftp push support _got_ to just start 
> scratching that itch, right?

Though, technically, ftp push could work with the curl code.

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux