Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El 19/12/2007, a las 0:41, Martin Langhoff escribió:

On Dec 19, 2007 4:42 AM, Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall.

I've dropped there myself, and work with a large team where we are
both fans of stash, and scarred by it. Any newcomer to git that
"discovers" stash gets hit by it a dozen times, this is completely
unnecesary.

I may be missing something here, but what's the danger here? An unexpected stash is incredibly easy to revert, unless I'm missing something. And nobody commented on the idea I posted earlier which seems to address the concerns about newbies not knowing what "git stash" with no params does:

http://marc.info/?l=git&m=119799257404542&w=2

Cheers,
Wincent



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux