Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> ...  The current behavior of git stash is very
>>> dangerous ...
> ...
>> This is a plain FUD, isn't it?  The first Oops should not happen these
>> days.
>
> *git pull in git*
> *reads Documentation/RelNotes-1.5.4.txt*
>
> Blah.  I didn't know follow the development over the past 3 weeks well
> enough, sorry for the noise.  I'm glad that this was improved.

But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered.  He wanted to
make the command list the stash without arguments.

This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed
was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did
not want it.  IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is
because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a
list.  If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary
commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit
there."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux