Hi,
Junio C Hamano schrieb am Mon 17. Dec, 16:31 (-0800):
> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >>> ... The current behavior of git stash is very
> >>> dangerous ...
> > ...
> >> This is a plain FUD, isn't it? The first Oops should not happen these
> >> days.
>
> But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered. He wanted to
> make the command list the stash without arguments.
>
> This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed
> was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did
> not want it. IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is
> because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a
> list. If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary
> commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit
> there."
When it should go quick why don't use an alias. git stash can print the
list and everyone who wants a quick stash can create an alias for this.
I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Die beste Tarnung ist die Wahrheit. Die glaubt einem keiner!
(Max Frisch: ‚Biedermann und die Brandstifter‘)
Attachment:
pgprFo5wIPIii.pgp
Description: PGP signature
