On Dec 18, 2007 1:42 PM, Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Junio C Hamano schrieb am Mon 17. Dec, 16:31 (-0800): > > Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > >> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> > > >>> ... The current behavior of git stash is very > > >>> dangerous ... > > > ... > > >> This is a plain FUD, isn't it? The first Oops should not happen these > > >> days. > > > > But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered. He wanted to > > make the command list the stash without arguments. > > > > This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed > > was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did > > not want it. IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is > > because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a > > list. If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary > > commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit > > there." > > When it should go quick why don't use an alias. git stash can print the > list and everyone who wants a quick stash can create an alias for this. > > I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall. > I got caught by this default too. One vote more! Regards, -- []s, André Goddard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
