Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:31:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered. He wanted to > make the command list the stash without arguments. > > This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed > was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did > not want it. IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is > because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a > list. If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary > commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit > there." Well, "git stash save" is just five characters more - I really don't see why this would be less comfortable (and for the really lazy people there are still aliases...). On the other hand (if "list" is the default), we'd get a more consistent interface which imho is imho more important than typing five characters less. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
