Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
> > Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > My point is that it would be nice if all git commands that actually 
> > > manipulate objects (create/delete/modify) had a safe default, and 
> > > that experienced users such as yourself could endure the 
> > > insufferable agony of retraining your fingers to type five more 
> > > chars so that people won't have to get bitten by surprises.
> > 
> > Also for "git commit"?
> 
> git commit has a very safe default; It runs "git status" and exits.

Not in my universe.  It starts an editor, and then commits what I staged.

> > In my opinion _basic_ usage of git-stash is simply using it with one 
> > stash only: "git stash" / "git unstash" (i.e. "git stash apply"; by 
> > the way this is one (beside "git view") use case for builtin 
> > predefined aliases).  Using it with multiple stashes (only then "git 
> > stash list" is needed) is advanced usage; and for advanced usage 
> > longer form is preferred, I think.
> > 
> 
> Perhaps. I'll stop quibbling about it. I don't care very deeply about it 
> anyway.

Ah.  That explains why you made a case against the default operation ;-)

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux