On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM IST, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote: > Hi Patrick, Christian and all, > > On 07/02/25 16:25, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > One thought: From my point of view I'd strongly favor extending > > git-refs(1) over reftable support in the dumb HTTP transport. So if I > > had two applications, one for each topic, I'd lean towards applications > > for the former topic. That might easily cause unfairness in case > > students aren't aware of that. > > > > So unless somebody else wants to be main-mentor in that project, I think > > we should either drop the HTTP transport tropic, or communicate our > > priorities clearly. > > That makes sense. I've added a note to convey this clearly. Kindly check > if the change in the following PR looks fine. > > https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/750/files > > > On 07/02/25 13:37, Christian Couder wrote: > > Yeah, but we have time to decide on this. It seems to me that we can > > still come up with new project ideas and possibly new mentors or > > co-mentors until it's time for applicants to send their.application. > > Indeed. More volunteer mentors and ideas are always welcome :-) Hi, I can co-mentor this summer. The 'Machine-Readable Repository Information Query Tool' project seems interesting to me, although I'm up for co-mentoring in other projects as well. Let me know if you need any help with anything else. Thanks.
