Hi Patrick, Christian and all, On 07/02/25 16:25, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
One thought: From my point of view I'd strongly favor extending git-refs(1) over reftable support in the dumb HTTP transport. So if I had two applications, one for each topic, I'd lean towards applications for the former topic. That might easily cause unfairness in case students aren't aware of that. So unless somebody else wants to be main-mentor in that project, I think we should either drop the HTTP transport tropic, or communicate our priorities clearly.
That makes sense. I've added a note to convey this clearly. Kindly check if the change in the following PR looks fine.
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/750/files On 07/02/25 13:37, Christian Couder wrote: > Yeah, but we have time to decide on this. It seems to me that we can > still come up with new project ideas and possibly new mentors or > co-mentors until it's time for applicants to send their.application. Indeed. More volunteer mentors and ideas are always welcome :-) -- Sivaraam
