Re: [PATCH v2] worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:05 AM Olga Pilipenco
<olga.pilipenco@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 7:44 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Examining more closely, I see that your message was in fact multipart
> > MIME with an HTML portion which was using <blockquote> and whatnot,
> > which my (plain text) mailer stripped out, hence lost all formatting.
> > If you can configure your mailer to send plain text and use the normal
> > ">" markers, that would be generally helpful on this list.
>
> Ufff, my bad, sorry about that (should be plain text now).

Yup, looks good.

> I'm having trouble responding to my previous email and keeping that
> quoting format,
> so I'll not waste time on trying to fix that (please forgive me, everyone).
> Just want to let you know that I agree with your response, I'll adjust my patch.
> Enough talking, let's get the code out!

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux