Re: [PATCH v2] worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 7:44 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:32 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > (By the way, when replying, please use the normal ">", "> >", "> > >"
> > markers to signify quoted portions of earlier messages in the thread
> > rather than using only indentation. The reason I make this request is
> > that when I replied to your message, my mailer stripped away all
> > indentation from your message, leaving all earlier quoted portions
> > flush with the left margin, which made it very difficult to figure out
> > which quotes came from which authors from which earlier messages, and
> > I ended up having to reinsert the "> >" markers manually to restore
> > structure to my reply.)
>
> Examining more closely, I see that your message was in fact multipart
> MIME with an HTML portion which was using <blockquote> and whatnot,
> which my (plain text) mailer stripped out, hence lost all formatting.
> If you can configure your mailer to send plain text and use the normal
> ">" markers, that would be generally helpful on this list.

Ufff, my bad, sorry about that (should be plain text now).
I'm having trouble responding to my previous email and keeping that
quoting format,
so I'll not waste time on trying to fix that (please forgive me, everyone).
Just want to let you know that I agree with your response, I'll adjust my patch.
Enough talking, let's get the code out!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux