Re: [PATCH v2] worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:32 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (By the way, when replying, please use the normal ">", "> >", "> > >"
> markers to signify quoted portions of earlier messages in the thread
> rather than using only indentation. The reason I make this request is
> that when I replied to your message, my mailer stripped away all
> indentation from your message, leaving all earlier quoted portions
> flush with the left margin, which made it very difficult to figure out
> which quotes came from which authors from which earlier messages, and
> I ended up having to reinsert the "> >" markers manually to restore
> structure to my reply.)

Examining more closely, I see that your message was in fact multipart
MIME with an HTML portion which was using <blockquote> and whatnot,
which my (plain text) mailer stripped out, hence lost all formatting.
If you can configure your mailer to send plain text and use the normal
">" markers, that would be generally helpful on this list.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux