Re: [PATCH] fsck: reject misconfigured fsck.skipList

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>
> If the value is missing, i.e.,
>
> 	[fsck]
> 		skipList
>
> it is a very clear misconfiguration.  "We expect a path, but you
> gave me a valueless true".  Once a specified value gets to
> oidset_parse_file(), we would die when a specified path cannot be
> opened, so it is not like we want to deliberately tolerate
> misconfiguration (we also die if the value is given as "~t/sl" and
> user "t" does not exist on the system).
>
> Makes sense.

Yeah, I did some testing as well and reviewed the code. Also makes sense
to me.

--
Toon




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux