Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 01:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> The first version just had patch 1 but this one fixes two other places.
>> The two other places where unearthered during the v1 discussion.
>
> OK.  I guess they could be handled in a single patch, but the three
> patches address different things to be commented properly, so having
> them as three separate patches is good.
>
>> Rebased on `master` (b31fb630c0 (Merge https://github.com/j6t/git-gui,
>> 2024-11-11)).
>
> Was there any reason, other than "newer must be better" (which is
> not always true)?  I thought there isn't any in-flight topics that
> touched the sequencer machinery.

I’m sorry. I worked on the v2 by rebasing on `jc/strbuf-commented-something`
which was in `seen` at the time. Then when I had to `rebase --onto` back
someplace I picked `master` since I didn’t need the interdiff for the cover
letter (two new patches, no changes to the first one).





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux