kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > The first version just had patch 1 but this one fixes two other places. > The two other places where unearthered during the v1 discussion. OK. I guess they could be handled in a single patch, but the three patches address different things to be commented properly, so having them as three separate patches is good. > Rebased on `master` (b31fb630c0 (Merge https://github.com/j6t/git-gui, > 2024-11-11)). Was there any reason, other than "newer must be better" (which is not always true)? I thought there isn't any in-flight topics that touched the sequencer machinery. > Some failures that didn’t look relevant. Judging from https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/11774751134 (which you rebased the topic on) passing all these CI tests, if your topic saw CI breakages, there is nothing else we can put the blame on. But let's see what happens. I won't see CI failures on individual topic, but we will see what the topic, together with everybody else, in the context of 'seen', produces when I push today's integration result out. Thanks.
