Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Does
>
> `-1`, `--base`::
> `-2`, `--ours`::
> `-3`, `--theirs`::
>
> not work? (I think we agree that grouping synonyms should be done and
> not all tokens moved onto a flat line.)
With the current
-1 --base::
-2 --ours::
-3 --theirs::
body text
these are coalesced into a single header and get rendered as
-1 --base, -2 --ours, -3 --theirs
body text
which reasonably shows that 1 and base belong to the same family
that is different from 2 and ours, etc. With an explicit comma
in between 1 and base, would we end up with
-1, --base, -2, --ours, -3, --theirs
which may be worse than what we have currently?
Thanks.
