On 10/07/2024 23:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: So, looking back the discussion list on https://lore.kernel.org/git/85b6b8a9-ee5f-42ab-bcbc-49976b30ef33@xxxxxx/ any loose ends still need to be addressed? I didn't spot any myself, so I am willing to merge it to 'next' soonish, but please stop me if there were something I missed.
I thought René was planning a re-roll to avoid using xstrfmt() in Patch 2 c.f <97390954-49bc-48c4-bab1-95be10717aca@xxxxxx>. Also I'm not sure we've reached a conclusion on whether to include the "if" in the macro or require the user to write "if(TEST_RUN(...))". My impression is that there is a consensus building around having the macro include the "if" but we haven't decided what to call it c.f. <62d221cc-532a-4a6d-8e96-b5a246ddeb1b@xxxxxx>
Best Wishes Phillip
