Re: [PATCH 0/6] unit-tests: add and use TEST_RUN to simplify tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/07/2024 23:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> So, looking back the discussion list on
>>    https://lore.kernel.org/git/85b6b8a9-ee5f-42ab-bcbc-49976b30ef33@xxxxxx/
>> any loose ends still need to be addressed?  I didn't spot any
>> myself, so I am willing to merge it to 'next' soonish, but please
>> stop me if there were something I missed.
>
> I thought René was planning a re-roll to avoid using xstrfmt() in
> Patch 2 c.f <97390954-49bc-48c4-bab1-95be10717aca@xxxxxx>. Also I'm
> not sure we've reached a conclusion on whether to include the "if" in
> the macro or require the user to write "if(TEST_RUN(...))". My
> impression is that there is a consensus building around having the
> macro include the "if" but we haven't decided what to call it
> c.f. <62d221cc-532a-4a6d-8e96-b5a246ddeb1b@xxxxxx>
>
> Best Wishes

Thanks.  Very much appreciated.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux