Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 03:09:37PM +0300, Karthik Nayak wrote: >> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c >> index cdc4d25557..e29abebe1d 100644 >> --- a/refs.c >> +++ b/refs.c >> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int refs_delete_ref(struct ref_store *refs, const char *msg, >> transaction = ref_store_transaction_begin(refs, &err); >> if (!transaction || >> ref_transaction_delete(transaction, refname, old_oid, >> - flags, msg, &err) || >> + flags, NULL, msg, &err) || >> ref_transaction_commit(transaction, &err)) { >> error("%s", err.buf); >> ref_transaction_free(transaction); >> @@ -1283,14 +1283,20 @@ int ref_transaction_create(struct ref_transaction *transaction, >> int ref_transaction_delete(struct ref_transaction *transaction, >> const char *refname, >> const struct object_id *old_oid, >> - unsigned int flags, const char *msg, >> + unsigned int flags, >> + const char *old_target, > > The old target is somewhat weirdly placed here, as I'd have expected it > to live next to `old_oid`. That's only a minor nit, nothing that's worth > a reroll in my opinion. > This is a good point. >> diff --git a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh >> index 52801be07d..848d6fc42e 100755 >> --- a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh >> +++ b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh >> @@ -1731,6 +1731,60 @@ do >> test_cmp expect actual >> ' >> >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete fails without --no-deref" ' >> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref $a && >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$a" >stdin && >> + test_must_fail git update-ref --stdin $type <stdin 2>err && >> + grep "fatal: symref-delete: cannot operate with deref mode" err >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete fails with no ref" ' >> + format_command $type "symref-delete " >stdin && >> + test_must_fail git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin 2>err && >> + grep "fatal: symref-delete: missing <ref>" err >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete fails with too many arguments" ' >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$a" "$a" >stdin && >> + test_must_fail git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin 2>err && >> + if test "$type" = "-z" >> + then >> + grep "fatal: unknown command: $a" err >> + else >> + grep "fatal: symref-delete refs/heads/symref: extra input: $a" err >> + fi >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete fails with wrong old value" ' >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$m" >stdin && >> + test_must_fail git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin 2>err && >> + grep "fatal: verifying symref target: ${SQ}refs/heads/symref${SQ}: is at $a but expected refs/heads/main" err && >> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref >expect && >> + echo $a >actual && >> + test_cmp expect actual >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete works with right old value" ' >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$a" >stdin && >> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin && >> + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify -q refs/heads/symref >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete works with empty old value" ' >> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref $a >stdin && >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "" >stdin && >> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin && >> + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify -q $b >> + ' >> + >> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete succeeds for dangling reference" ' >> + test_must_fail git symbolic-ref refs/heads/nonexistent && >> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref2 refs/heads/nonexistent && >> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref2" "refs/heads/nonexistent" >stdin && >> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin && >> + test_must_fail git symbolic-ref -d refs/heads/symref2 >> + ' >> + > > Not sure whether I overlooked it, but one test I missed was when trying > to delete a non-symbolic-ref. > > Patrick I think this point is worthwhile of a reroll, not because of the test itself, but because while testing it, I realized that currently when we try to delete a regular ref using `symref-delete` and providing an `old_target`, the error message is quite generic. I've added a new commit to make this more specific and will send in a new version today.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature