Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
>> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete fails with wrong old value" '
>> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$m" >stdin &&
>> + test_must_fail git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin 2>err &&
>> + grep "fatal: verifying symref target: ${SQ}refs/heads/symref${SQ}: is at $a but expected refs/heads/main" err &&
>> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref >expect &&
>> + echo $a >actual &&
>> + test_cmp expect actual
>> + '
>> +
>> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete works with right old value" '
>> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "$a" >stdin &&
>> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin &&
>> + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify -q refs/heads/symref
>> + '
>> +
>> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete works with empty old value" '
>> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref $a >stdin &&
>> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref" "" >stdin &&
>> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin &&
>> + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify -q $b
>> + '
>> +
>> + test_expect_success "stdin $type symref-delete succeeds for dangling reference" '
>> + test_must_fail git symbolic-ref refs/heads/nonexistent &&
>> + git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref2 refs/heads/nonexistent &&
>> + format_command $type "symref-delete refs/heads/symref2" "refs/heads/nonexistent" >stdin &&
>> + git update-ref --stdin $type --no-deref <stdin &&
>> + test_must_fail git symbolic-ref -d refs/heads/symref2
>> + '
>> +
>
> Not sure whether I overlooked it, but one test I missed was when trying
> to delete a non-symbolic-ref.
Hmph, so we want to see an attempt to run symref-delete of
refs/heads/main when refs/heads/main is *not* a symref to fail?
That is a reasonable test to have.
When you invent a shiny new toy, it is hard to make sure you covered
cases where it should not kick in or positively diagnose a failure.
A review with a sharp eye to spot missing tests is very much
appreciated.
THanks.
